Thursday, November 5, 2026Commercial real estate news
About The Basis
the basis.

Commercial real estate.
The full picture.

Saved stories
Latest stories
Rates
RATE WATCHDaily benchmarks10-year Treasury4.84%-6 bpAs of Nov 55-year Treasury4.59%-10 bpAs of Nov 5SOFR3.92%-2 bpAs of Nov 5Effective Fed funds3.88%UnchangedAs of Nov 5
STATE MARKET PULSESeptember 2026 · BLS · Monthly
New YorkJobs YoY +0.2%Unemployment 4.3%FloridaJobs YoY +0.6%Unemployment 4.4%TexasJobs YoY +1.1%Unemployment 4.4%CaliforniaJobs YoY +0.7%Unemployment 5.1%New JerseyJobs YoY +0.1%Unemployment 4.2%North CarolinaJobs YoY +1.3%Unemployment 3.4%AlabamaJobs YoY +1.0%Unemployment 3.5%AlaskaJobs YoY +1.2%Unemployment 4.3%ArizonaJobs YoY +0.6%Unemployment 4.9%ArkansasJobs YoY +0.9%Unemployment 3.9%ColoradoJobs YoY +0.4%Unemployment 4.1%ConnecticutJobs YoY +0.9%Unemployment 5.1%DelawareJobs YoY +0.3%Unemployment 4.6%District of ColumbiaJobs YoY -3.5%Unemployment 5.6%GeorgiaJobs YoY 0.0%Unemployment 3.3%HawaiiJobs YoY +0.1%Unemployment 2.8%IdahoJobs YoY +1.0%Unemployment 3.6%IllinoisJobs YoY +0.2%Unemployment 4.6%IndianaJobs YoY -0.4%Unemployment 3.4%IowaJobs YoY +0.3%Unemployment 3.2%KansasJobs YoY +0.3%Unemployment 3.8%KentuckyJobs YoY 0.0%Unemployment 4.7%LouisianaJobs YoY +1.8%Unemployment 4.0%MaineJobs YoY +0.1%Unemployment 3.3%MarylandJobs YoY -0.5%Unemployment 3.9%MassachusettsJobs YoY +0.4%Unemployment 4.3%MichiganJobs YoY 0.0%Unemployment 5.0%MinnesotaJobs YoY +1.2%Unemployment 4.5%MississippiJobs YoY +0.6%Unemployment 3.3%MissouriJobs YoY +1.0%Unemployment 3.6%MontanaJobs YoY -1.0%Unemployment 3.1%NebraskaJobs YoY +0.4%Unemployment 2.9%NevadaJobs YoY +1.6%Unemployment 4.7%New HampshireJobs YoY +0.3%Unemployment 2.6%New MexicoJobs YoY +1.3%Unemployment 4.7%North DakotaJobs YoY +0.2%Unemployment 2.2%OhioJobs YoY +0.3%Unemployment 3.4%OklahomaJobs YoY +0.8%Unemployment 4.2%OregonJobs YoY -0.1%Unemployment 5.0%PennsylvaniaJobs YoY +0.7%Unemployment 3.6%Rhode IslandJobs YoY -0.1%Unemployment 3.6%South CarolinaJobs YoY +2.3%Unemployment 4.0%South DakotaJobs YoY +0.4%Unemployment 2.0%TennesseeJobs YoY +0.8%Unemployment 3.4%UtahJobs YoY +1.5%Unemployment 3.5%VermontJobs YoY -0.1%Unemployment 2.6%VirginiaJobs YoY -0.6%Unemployment 3.6%WashingtonJobs YoY +0.7%Unemployment 4.8%West VirginiaJobs YoY 0.0%Unemployment 4.0%WisconsinJobs YoY +0.4%Unemployment 3.2%WyomingJobs YoY +0.9%Unemployment 3.0%
All states
Distress & CMBS / NEWS

Oakland foreclosure tax measure leads with 79 percent support

Preliminary Oakland returns favor a change to foreclosure transfer-tax exemptions. Lenders and investors have another transaction cost to evaluate.

Jordan EllisPolicy & LegalNovember 4, 2026 · 2 min read
The Oakland skyline viewed from Kensington. Archival photo, December 23, 2025.
The Oakland skyline viewed from Kensington. Archival photo, December 23, 2025. Photo: Ligocsicnarf89 / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 4.0. Resized, converted to WebP and cropped to fit the layout. Adapted image remains under CC BY 4.0.

Oakland voters strongly backed a measure to narrow the city’s foreclosure exemption from real property transfer taxes, according to preliminary results posted Wednesday by Alameda County.

Measure FF had 56,505 yes votes, or 79.30%, against 14,753 no votes in the county’s 2:07 a.m. November 4 update. It requires a simple majority. The county labeled the results preliminary and unofficial, so the tally should not be presented as certified.

The measure targets property transfers that previously qualified for a foreclosure exception. Beginning January 1, 2027, it would apply Oakland’s existing transfer-tax rates to newly covered transfers rather than establish a separate tax-rate schedule.

For commercial lenders and distressed-asset buyers, that changes the costs to examine when a loan resolution involves taking ownership of real estate. A transaction that once escaped the transfer tax may generate an additional obligation under the measure.

But the proposal does not eliminate every foreclosure-related exception. Its ballot language preserves specified transfers involving conversion of commercial property to certain housing or healthcare uses, transfers to community banking organizations, and certain residential properties with four units or fewer. It also gives the City Council authority to establish, amend or remove foreclosure-related exceptions.

Those provisions make the details important for investors considering reuse of a commercial building. A housing or healthcare conversion should not automatically be assumed to qualify merely because the buyer intends to change the use. Eligibility depends on the measure’s requirements and the facts of the transfer.

The ballot language estimates annual revenue of approximately $4 million to $13 million. That range is a projection of future collections, not an amount the city has already secured. It also reflects the practical difficulty of predicting activity in a market driven by individual loan defaults and resolutions.

The most immediate effect for CRE professionals is therefore in diligence and transaction modeling. Lenders, borrowers and potential buyers will need to determine whether a contemplated transfer remains exempt, what tax rate applies and whether its timing brings it within the new rules.

It is too early to conclude that Measure FF will reduce foreclosures, accelerate conversions or change market values. The election establishes strong preliminary support for changing a transaction-tax exemption. The economic response will emerge through subsequent deals and the city’s administration of the measure.

For now, Oakland’s distressed-property market has another variable to price into transactions expected to close in 2027.

Sources

Alameda County unofficial election results

Official Measure FF election materials

Ballotpedia measure text

Foreclosure taxesDistressed assetsElections

Published by The Basis. Research dates, source references and illustrative assumptions are retained from the original article.

Keep reading.

All stories